| Brazilian rosewood, as every guitarist knows,
WAS (note past tense...read on) the
traditional premier tonewood for a classical guitar back and sides. It can
be one of nature's most beautiful materials (although species-marginal
variants can be pretty drab). It's density and stiffness seem to
be ideal for producing the unique resonance commonly associated with the
tone of a classical guitar. Having said this, Brazilian rosewood
has never been without its problems. Only a few trees grow straight; others twist and
turn while growing, producing wood that can get pretty heavily figured, even
gnarled. This can produce stresses and fissures that are sometimes difficult
to spot in an unfabricated set. A variety of bugs and worms love the stuff
and bore around in the living trees to get their share. All this adds up to
more work (and often more grief) for the luthier and a higher risk of cracks
and warping for the guitarist.
Add to this CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered
Species). Ah, CITES, intended to keep Dalbergia nigra (that's the
botanical name for Brazilian rosewood) from extinction, but probably
destined to assure that very fate. (Who besides governments wants
to protect living things that are economically worthless because they
are illegal to harvest.) It's still legal to use wood harvested before
June 11, 1992, and a guitar with Brazilian rosewood parts can still be
exported if the shipment is accompanied by documentation testifying to
it's provenance (nearly impossible to obtain), but no living Brazilian
rosewood trees may be harvested, none. What has happened to the price of
Brazilian rosewood? You guessed it: it's soared.
A few suppliers have tried
going back to the remnants of old forests in Brazil and harvesting
Brazilian rosewood stumps, some of which have been in the ground for
decades. Stumps, you say! Actually, what they're after is the taproot.
It's all legal under CITES because no living trees are being murdered.
This wood is in a state of seasoning much like it would have been if it
had come from logs growing above ground. The wood is still wet when it
is harvested, but the moisture is intra-cellular and dries out quickly.
Some of these sets are very excellent in their aesthetic and technical
luthiery merits. There's just one problem: the cost
of recovering this wood in a quality level suitable for guitars is
extremely high. For this reason, suppliers have all but deserted this
market.
If only we could say Brazilian rosewood makes guitars sound better.
Many guitarists, including some highly respected ones, are absolutely
convinced it does, but, folks, I'm just as convinced it isn't so, and
unlike most guitarists I've actually made an attempt to test this with
some rigor (see Tone Variables in Guitar Construction (http://www.pjguitar.com/article4.htm)).
In spite of all this (because of it?...!), some
guitarists still insist on guitars made of
Brazilian rosewood. Sorry, I'm just not willing to
struggle with the Brazilian dearth any more, and you diehard folks really
need to get real and take a serious look at the alternatives. Indian
rosewood, Brazilian's top competitor for many years, has none of the
drawbacks of Brazilian: it is straight-grained, bughole-free, very
stable and, if fabricated under proper humidity conditions, virtually
immune to cracking. Indian rosewood is on average about 10% lower
in density (which I regard as a significant tone variable) than Brazilian,
but by careful selection I can come up with Indian sets which are well
into the Brazilian density range.
A more recent arrival
among Brazilian rosewood alternatives on the guitar backs/sides market
is Madagascar rosewood. This wood, like Indian rosewood, is currently in
plentiful supply of very high quality. It's appearance and physical
characteristics are uncannily similar to Brazilian: the density range is
almost exactly the same, it's typical color is like the Brazilian rosewood
of the
brick-red color way. Its typical figuring is a dead ringer for Brazilian,
sometimes including even the "webbing" often associated with Brazilian, but it is less
prone to the kind of tree-twist figure which often creates instability.
There are far fewer worm- and bugholes. The trees tend to be somewhat small,
which means that sets for larger guitars typically have three- or four-piece
backs (which presents no construction problem with today's adhesive
technology), but two-piece backs continue to be available for classicals. In
every respect, Madagascar rosewood is the most attractive and acoustically
ideal replacement for Brazilian to be found anywhere.
|